A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches

Vibhuti J. Patel; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Susan E. Slade; Joanna B. Connolly; Andrew Crombie; J. Colin Murrell; James H. Scrivens

doi:10.1021/pr900080y

A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches

Vibhuti J. Patel, Konstantinos Thalassinos, Susan E. Slade, Joanna B. Connolly, Andrew Crombie, J. Colin Murrell, James H. Scrivens

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

208 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The proteome of the recently discovered bacterium Methylocella silvestris has been characterized using three profiling and comparative proteomics approaches. The organism has been grown on two different substrates enabling variations in protein expression to be identified. The results obtained using the experimental approaches have been compared with respect to number of proteins identified, confidence in identification, sequence coverage and agreement of regulated proteins. The sample preparation, instrumental time and sample loading requirements of the differing experiments are compared and discussed. A preliminary screen of the protein regulation results for biological significance has also been performed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3752-3759
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Proteome Research
Volume	8
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1021/pr900080y
Publication status	Published - Jul 2009

Access to Document

10.1021/pr900080y

Cite this

@article{bc92c71259cf47509b4459f6fd75e01b,

title = "A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches",

abstract = "The proteome of the recently discovered bacterium Methylocella silvestris has been characterized using three profiling and comparative proteomics approaches. The organism has been grown on two different substrates enabling variations in protein expression to be identified. The results obtained using the experimental approaches have been compared with respect to number of proteins identified, confidence in identification, sequence coverage and agreement of regulated proteins. The sample preparation, instrumental time and sample loading requirements of the differing experiments are compared and discussed. A preliminary screen of the protein regulation results for biological significance has also been performed.",

author = "Patel, {Vibhuti J.} and Konstantinos Thalassinos and Slade, {Susan E.} and Connolly, {Joanna B.} and Andrew Crombie and Murrell, {J. Colin} and Scrivens, {James H.}",

year = "2009",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1021/pr900080y",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

pages = "3752--3759",

journal = "Journal of Proteome Research",

issn = "1535-3893",

publisher = "American Chemical Society",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches

AU - Patel, Vibhuti J.

AU - Thalassinos, Konstantinos

AU - Slade, Susan E.

AU - Connolly, Joanna B.

AU - Crombie, Andrew

AU - Murrell, J. Colin

AU - Scrivens, James H.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - The proteome of the recently discovered bacterium Methylocella silvestris has been characterized using three profiling and comparative proteomics approaches. The organism has been grown on two different substrates enabling variations in protein expression to be identified. The results obtained using the experimental approaches have been compared with respect to number of proteins identified, confidence in identification, sequence coverage and agreement of regulated proteins. The sample preparation, instrumental time and sample loading requirements of the differing experiments are compared and discussed. A preliminary screen of the protein regulation results for biological significance has also been performed.

AB - The proteome of the recently discovered bacterium Methylocella silvestris has been characterized using three profiling and comparative proteomics approaches. The organism has been grown on two different substrates enabling variations in protein expression to be identified. The results obtained using the experimental approaches have been compared with respect to number of proteins identified, confidence in identification, sequence coverage and agreement of regulated proteins. The sample preparation, instrumental time and sample loading requirements of the differing experiments are compared and discussed. A preliminary screen of the protein regulation results for biological significance has also been performed.

U2 - 10.1021/pr900080y

DO - 10.1021/pr900080y

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 3752

EP - 3759

JO - Journal of Proteome Research

JF - Journal of Proteome Research

SN - 1535-3893

IS - 7

ER -