A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures

Garry R. Barton; John Bankart; Adrian C. Davis

doi:10.1080/14992020500057566

A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures

Garry R. Barton, John Bankart, Adrian C. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	157-63
Number of pages	7
Journal	International Journal of Audiology
Volume	44
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500057566
Publication status	Published - 2005

Access to Document

10.1080/14992020500057566

Cite this

@article{c4f7f520cca44c87a537a29defc02221,

title = "A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.",

author = "Barton, {Garry R.} and John Bankart and Davis, {Adrian C.}",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1080/14992020500057566",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "157--63",

journal = "International Journal of Audiology",

issn = "1499-2027",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures

AU - Barton, Garry R.

AU - Bankart, John

AU - Davis, Adrian C.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.

U2 - 10.1080/14992020500057566

DO - 10.1080/14992020500057566

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 157

EP - 163

JO - International Journal of Audiology

JF - International Journal of Audiology

SN - 1499-2027

IS - 3

ER -