Abstract
Conventional wisdom argues that environmental policy is less costly if it induces the development of cleaner technologies. In contrast to this argument, we show that once the second-best nature of actual economies is taken into account, the cost of environmental policy may well be larger with induced technical change (ITC) than without. Thus, ITC may lower both the emissions reductions and the welfare gains associated with environmental policy. In an endogenous policy framework, ITC may reduce the desired stringency of the policy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-169 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | European Economic Review |
Volume | 99 |
Early online date | 22 Jan 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
Keywords
- Environmental Policy
- Innovation Policy
- Induced Technical Change
- Crowding-out
- Second-best Policy
Profiles
-
Corrado Di Maria
- School of Economics - Professor of Environmental & Natural Resource Economics
- Research and Innovation Services - ClimateUEA Academic Chair
- Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) - Member
- Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research - Member
- Applied Econometrics And Finance - Member
- Economic Theory - Member
- Environment, Resources and Conflict - Member
- ClimateUEA - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research