TY - JOUR
T1 - A process for the systematic review of community-based rehabilitation evaluation reports: Sifting evidence for policy and practice in community based rehabilitation
AU - Kuipers, Pim
AU - Hartley, Sally
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - A methodological framework for conducting a systematic, mostly qualitative, meta-synthesis of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) project evaluation reports is described. Developed in the course of an international pilot study, the framework proposes a systematic review process in phases which are strongly collaborative, methodologically rigorous and detailed. Through this suggested process, valuable descriptive data about CBR practice, strategies and outcomes may be synthesized. It is anticipated that future application of this methodology will contribute to an improved evidence base for CBR, which will facilitate the development of more appropriate policy and practice guidelines for disability service delivery in developing countries. The methodology will also have potential applications in areas beyond CBR, which are similarly ‘evidence poor’ (lacking empirical research) but ‘data rich’ (with plentiful descriptive and evaluative reports).
AB - A methodological framework for conducting a systematic, mostly qualitative, meta-synthesis of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) project evaluation reports is described. Developed in the course of an international pilot study, the framework proposes a systematic review process in phases which are strongly collaborative, methodologically rigorous and detailed. Through this suggested process, valuable descriptive data about CBR practice, strategies and outcomes may be synthesized. It is anticipated that future application of this methodology will contribute to an improved evidence base for CBR, which will facilitate the development of more appropriate policy and practice guidelines for disability service delivery in developing countries. The methodology will also have potential applications in areas beyond CBR, which are similarly ‘evidence poor’ (lacking empirical research) but ‘data rich’ (with plentiful descriptive and evaluative reports).
U2 - 10.1097/01.mrr.0000185950.02552.db
DO - 10.1097/01.mrr.0000185950.02552.db
M3 - Article
VL - 29
SP - 27
EP - 30
JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
SN - 0342-5282
IS - 1
ER -