TY - JOUR
T1 - Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes
AU - Goglio, P.
AU - Williams, A. G.
AU - Balta-Ozkan, N.
AU - Harris, N. R.P.
AU - Williamson, P.
AU - Huisingh, D.
AU - Zhang, Z.
AU - Tavoni, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
A special thanks goes to the Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Dutch Ministry for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) and to the funders of the UP-Green-LCA (NE/P019668/1) and SOILS-R-GGREAT (NE/P019498/1) projects through the greenhouse gas removal (GGR) programme. The GGR programme is financed by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC) and the UK department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). The authors wish to acknowledge the Royal Society for providing precious insights at the Sackler Forum and Dr Mary Ann Curran for the precious comments.
Funding Information:
A special thanks goes to the Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Dutch Ministry for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) and to the funders of the UP-Green-LCA ( NE/P019668/1 ) and SOILS-R-GGREAT ( NE/P019498/1 ) projects through the greenhouse gas removal (GGR) programme. The GGR programme is financed by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) , Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) , Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC) and the UK department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) . The authors wish to acknowledge the Royal Society for providing precious insights at the Sackler Forum and Dr Mary Ann Curran for the precious comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1/20
Y1 - 2020/1/20
N2 - Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement.
AB - Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement.
KW - Climate change
KW - Environmental assessment
KW - Greenhouse gas removal technologies
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Methodology
KW - Negative emission technologies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073718794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85073718794
VL - 244
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
SN - 0959-6526
M1 - 118896
ER -
