Abstract
The sanctions by the UK and EU against Russia have raised difficult questions about upholding exclusive jurisdiction and arbitration clauses. One way of trying to uphold jurisdiction clauses is by granting injunctive relief to restrain the enforcement of any resulting judgement in breach of the same. This article examines the recent approach of the English Courts to granting Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs) which seek to restrain a party from enforcing a judgement obtained in a foreign Court in breach of a jurisdiction clause. Two shifts have occurred: the role of comity has been substantially marginalised; and the English Courts have been willing to grant AEI relief on a pre-emptive basis before any foreign judgement is rendered. The article argues that whilst these developments reflect an appropriate response to the use of Russian legislation to circumvent arbitration agreements and exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Russian cases should be understood as exceptional and may not represent a permanent recalibration of the doctrine.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of International Arbitration |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 1 Oct 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Oct 2026 |
Keywords
- Private International Law
- Anti-Enforcement Injunctions
- Anti-Suit Injunctions
- Comity
- International Commercial Arbitration
- International Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration Agreements
- Injunctive Relief
- Sanctions
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver