TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of a numerical index of discriminatory power to a comparison of four physiochemical typing methods for Candida albicans
AU - Hunter, P. R.
AU - Fraser, C. A.
PY - 1989/10/1
Y1 - 1989/10/1
N2 - Four typing methods for the strain differentiation of Candida albicans (morphotyping, resistotyping, extracellular enzyme production, and carbon source assimilation reactions) were compared on a single population of 100 strains. An index of discriminatory power was used to facilitate this comparison. Extracellular enzyme production had poor discriminatory power, and carbon source assimilation reactions were poorly reproducible. Morphotyping and resistotyping had acceptable reproducibility and discrimination. The use of resistotyping and morphotyping in parallel enhanced discrimination without an unacceptable decrease in reproducibility, although other combinations did not enhance discrimination because reproductibility was impaired.
AB - Four typing methods for the strain differentiation of Candida albicans (morphotyping, resistotyping, extracellular enzyme production, and carbon source assimilation reactions) were compared on a single population of 100 strains. An index of discriminatory power was used to facilitate this comparison. Extracellular enzyme production had poor discriminatory power, and carbon source assimilation reactions were poorly reproducible. Morphotyping and resistotyping had acceptable reproducibility and discrimination. The use of resistotyping and morphotyping in parallel enhanced discrimination without an unacceptable decrease in reproducibility, although other combinations did not enhance discrimination because reproductibility was impaired.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0024429456&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2156-2160.1989
DO - 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2156-2160.1989
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 2156
EP - 2160
JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
SN - 0095-1137
IS - 10
ER -