Abstract
HRM and Migration scholars increasingly employ Bourdieu’s concepts of capitals, fields and habitus to explain the interrelationships between migrant careers and context. Both literatures employ a Bourdieusean framework to examine devaluation of migrant capitals in host nations and migrant responses to such devaluation. However, their explanations are based on different assumptions of context. HRM literature regards migrants as confined to the host nation context, whereas Migration literature places them in a transnational context, spanning both originating and host nations. In this conceptual paper, we argue for integrating transnational perspectives into HRM literature to offer a more accurate portrayal of contemporary migrant lives, and to capture greater nuance in migrant career experiences. We seek to expand the conceptual lexicon to support new conceptualisations of transnational context, and to explore how locating a Bourdieusean framework in transnational contexts enhances its ability to explain migrant career experiences.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2541-2564 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | International Journal of Human Resource Management |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 20 |
Early online date | 26 Mar 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- Migrant careers
- Bourdieu
- Capital
- Field
- Habitus
- Transnationalism
Profiles
-
Annilee Game
- Norwich Business School - Professor of Organisational Psychology
- Employment Systems and Institutions - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research