Abstract
The UK’s collective action regime has not taken off as many predicted, partly because the majority of funders (and lawyers) believe that success fees can only be received post-distribution (Rule 93(4)). This article shows that belief is based on an incorrect, simplistic, reading of the legislation and CAT Rules.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-12 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | European Competition Law Review |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Profiles
-
Sebastian Peyer
- School of Law - Associate Professor in Law
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Competition, Markets and Regulation - Member
- Media, Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research