Are spatial closures better than size limits for halting the decline of the North Sea thornback ray, Raja clavata?

Jessica Wiegand, Ewan Hunter, Nicholas K Dulvy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)


A key challenge of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management is to sustain viable populations of large-bodied less-productive vulnerable elasmobranchs that are the by-catch of fisheries that target more productive species. The North Sea population of the thornback ray (Raja clavata) is now mainly confined to the Thames Estuary and surrounding SW North Sea, which is subject to a flatfish trawl fishery. We explored the relative effectiveness of seasonal closures versus size-based landing restrictions using a four-season age-structured model. More than a third of adult thornback rays are currently removed by fishing each year, and without effective management, a further 90% decline within 30 years is likely. A three-season closure of the Thames Estuary was the shortest closure that ensured thornback ray recovery and minimal loss of fishery yield. Minimum and maximum landing size restrictions are nearly as effective at recovering thornback rays but less so at improving yield. While long seasonal closures and full marine protected areas are more effective at ensuring the recovery of thornback rays, length restrictions may be simpler to implement under the current institutional framework and may have less impact on the multispecies trawl fisheries operating in the area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)722-733
Number of pages12
JournalMarine and Freshwater Research
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2011


  • by-catch
  • discard
  • elasmobranch
  • length restrictions
  • management strategy evaluation
  • marine reserve

Cite this