TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the risk of stress in organizations
T2 - Getting the measure of organizational-level stressors
AU - Wood, Stephen
AU - Ghezzi, Valerio
AU - Barbaranelli, Claudio
AU - Di Tecco, Cristina
AU - Fida, Roberta
AU - Farnese, Maria Luisa
AU - Ronchetti, Matteo
AU - Iavicoli, Sergio
PY - 2019/12/20
Y1 - 2019/12/20
N2 - Great Britain’s Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the Management Standards Indicator Tool to help organizations to assess and monitor organizational risks of work-related stress through surveying employees about the psychosocial risks for stress in their jobs. The use of employee-level data for deriving an organizational-level measure of psychosocial risks assumes that the constructs have equivalent meanings at different levels. However, this isomorphic condition has never been tested and this study fills this gap. Using data collected by the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL) from 66,188 employees nested in 775 organizations, we demonstrate that the organizational-level measure representing the seven dimensions of the Management Standards Indicator Tool is equivalent, though not identical, to the individual-level measure. This implies that the organizational level is not a mirror of the aggregation of the individual level, and that the risk of work-related stress in an organization may derive not simply from bottom-up processes, but may be generated by top-down influences (e.g., organizational policies). Interventions may then be meaningfully targeted at the organizational level in the expectation that they will reduce the risk of work-related stress among the entire workforce, the valid measurement of which can be performed through the HSE’s Management Standards Indicator Tool.
AB - Great Britain’s Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the Management Standards Indicator Tool to help organizations to assess and monitor organizational risks of work-related stress through surveying employees about the psychosocial risks for stress in their jobs. The use of employee-level data for deriving an organizational-level measure of psychosocial risks assumes that the constructs have equivalent meanings at different levels. However, this isomorphic condition has never been tested and this study fills this gap. Using data collected by the Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL) from 66,188 employees nested in 775 organizations, we demonstrate that the organizational-level measure representing the seven dimensions of the Management Standards Indicator Tool is equivalent, though not identical, to the individual-level measure. This implies that the organizational level is not a mirror of the aggregation of the individual level, and that the risk of work-related stress in an organization may derive not simply from bottom-up processes, but may be generated by top-down influences (e.g., organizational policies). Interventions may then be meaningfully targeted at the organizational level in the expectation that they will reduce the risk of work-related stress among the entire workforce, the valid measurement of which can be performed through the HSE’s Management Standards Indicator Tool.
KW - Control
KW - Demand
KW - Employee stress and well-being
KW - Management Standards Indicator Tool
KW - Organizational-level stressors
KW - Psychometric isomorphism
KW - Risk for work-related stress
KW - Role conflict and clarity
KW - Support theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077110144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02776
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02776
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077110144
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
SN - 1664-1078
M1 - 2776
ER -