Blaming the victim, all over again: Waddell and Aylward's biopsychosocial (BPS) model of disability

Tom Shakespeare, Nicholas Watson, Ola Abu Alghaib

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The biopsychosocial (BPS) model of mental distress, originally conceived by the American psychiatrist George Engel in the 1970s and commonly used in psychiatry and psychology, has been adapted by Gordon Waddell and Mansell Aylward to form the theoretical basis for current UK Government thinking on disability. Most importantly, the Waddell and Aylward version of the BPS has played a key role as the Government has sought to reform spending on out-of- work disability benefits. This paper presents a critique of Waddell and Aylward’s model, examining its origins, its claims and the evidence it employs. We will argue that its potential for genuine inter-disciplinary cooperation and the holistic and humanistic benefits for disabled people as envisaged by Engel are not now, if they ever have been, fully realized. Any potential benefit it may have offered has been eclipsed by its role in Coalition/Conservative government social welfare policies that have blamed the victim and justified restriction of entitlements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-41
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume37
Issue number1
Early online date25 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Disability classification
  • welfare benefits
  • assessment
  • employment

Cite this