Chemical transport models often underestimate inorganic aerosol acidity in remote regions of the atmosphere

Benjamin A. Nault, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Douglas A. Day, Duseong S. Jo, Jason C. Schroder, Hannah M. Allen, Roya Bahreini, Huisheng Bian, Donald R. Blake, Mian Chin, Simon L. Clegg, Peter R. Colarco, John D. Crounse, Michael J. Cubison, Peter F. Decarlo, Jack E. Dibb, Glenn S. Diskin, Alma Hodzic, Weiwei Hu, Joseph M. KatichMichelle J. Kim, John K. Kodros, Agnieszka Kupc, Felipe D. Lopez-Hilfiker, Eloise A. Marais, Ann M. Middlebrook, J. Andrew Neuman, John B. Nowak, Brett B. Palm, Fabien Paulot, Jeffrey R. Pierce, Gregory P. Schill, Eric Scheuer, Joel A. Thornton, Kostas Tsigaridis, Paul O. Wennberg, Christina J. Williamson, Jose L. Jimenez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The inorganic fraction of fine particles affects numerous physicochemical processes in the atmosphere. However, there is large uncertainty in its burden and composition due to limited global measurements. Here, we present observations from eleven different aircraft campaigns from around the globe and investigate how aerosol pH and ammonium balance change from polluted to remote regions, such as over the oceans. Both parameters show increasing acidity with remoteness, at all altitudes, with pH decreasing from about 3 to about −1 and ammonium balance decreasing from almost 1 to nearly 0. We compare these observations against nine widely used chemical transport models and find that the simulations show more scatter (generally R2 < 0.50) and typically predict less acidic aerosol in the most remote regions. These differences in observations and predictions are likely to result in underestimating the model-predicted direct radiative cooling effect for sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol by 15–39%.
Original languageEnglish
Article number93
JournalCommunications Earth & Environment
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2021

Cite this