Abstract
A key dimension of the debate about policy innovation is the extent to which new policies achieve significant and lasting effects on the problems they purport to address. However, little is known about such effects. We break new ground by investigating how far current evaluation practices in a policy system with relatively ambitious climate policies – the European Union – identify the most effective (carbon-reducing) policies. We find that a small number of policy instruments are projected to deliver the lion’s share of emission reductions. Setting aside the special case of emissions trading, these instruments are not particularly innovative. If significant practical and political obstacles can be addressed, more (detailed) evaluations could enhance the evidence base and also the political prospects for delivering deeper emissions cuts through to 2050. An evaluation perspective could also offer a very different way to consider policy innovation dynamics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 5 |
Pages (from-to) | 884-905 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Environmental Politics |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Jul 2014 |
Keywords
- innovation
- evaluation
- climate policy
- European Union
Profiles
-
Andy Jordan
- School of Environmental Sciences - Professor of Environmental Sciences
- Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research - Member
- ClimateUEA - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research
-
Tim Rayner
- School of Environmental Sciences - Research Fellow
- Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research - Member
- Environmental Social Sciences - Member
- Science, Society and Sustainability - Member
- ClimateUEA - Member
Person: Member, Research & Analogous, Research Group Member