TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-evolution of phytoplankton C:N:P stoichiometry and the deep ocean N:P ratio
AU - Lenton, T. M.
AU - Klausmeier, C. A.
N1 - This preprint was under review for the journal Biogeosciences Discussions but the revision was not accepted for publication in Biogeosciences.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - There is a long-established, remarkable correspondence between the nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio N:P~15 of deep ocean water and the ''Redfield ratio'' of N:P~16 required by phytoplankton. Redfield and subsequent workers have suggested that it is due to N-fixing organisms being selected when N:P<16 but being out-competed when N:P>16. Models have shown this mechanism can work, but recent observations reveal that the real system is more complex. First, the C:N:P stoichiometry of phytoplankton varies with growth rate, nutrient and light limitation, species and phylum. Second, although N-fixation is sometimes P-limited and suppressed by N-addition, there is also evidence for Fe-limitation, light-limitation and P and Fe co-limitation of N-fixers. Here we adapt recent models to include non-Redfieldian stoichiometry of phytoplankton and limitation of N-fixers by resources other than P. We show that the deep ocean N:P is set by the N:P threshold that triggers N-fixation, and is not directly related to the N:P ratio of sinking material. However, assuming competitive dynamics set the N:P threshold for N-fixation, it will be close to the N:P requirement of non-fixers (rather than that of N-fixers) and consequently so will the deep ocean N:P ratio. Theoretical limits on the N:P requirements of phytoplankton suggest that since the deep ocean became well oxygenated, its N:P has remained within the range 7.7–32.3. Decreases in phytoplankton C:P and N:P ratios over the past ~1 Gyr are predicted to have driven a decrease in deep ocean N:P, probably via increasing PO4. Even if Fe or light limitation restrict N-fixers to a fraction of the surface ocean, they reach higher densities there, minimising variations in deep ocean N:P. Thus Redfield's mechanism is robust and we expand it to suggest that phytoplankton C:N:P and deep ocean N:P have co-evolved.
AB - There is a long-established, remarkable correspondence between the nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio N:P~15 of deep ocean water and the ''Redfield ratio'' of N:P~16 required by phytoplankton. Redfield and subsequent workers have suggested that it is due to N-fixing organisms being selected when N:P<16 but being out-competed when N:P>16. Models have shown this mechanism can work, but recent observations reveal that the real system is more complex. First, the C:N:P stoichiometry of phytoplankton varies with growth rate, nutrient and light limitation, species and phylum. Second, although N-fixation is sometimes P-limited and suppressed by N-addition, there is also evidence for Fe-limitation, light-limitation and P and Fe co-limitation of N-fixers. Here we adapt recent models to include non-Redfieldian stoichiometry of phytoplankton and limitation of N-fixers by resources other than P. We show that the deep ocean N:P is set by the N:P threshold that triggers N-fixation, and is not directly related to the N:P ratio of sinking material. However, assuming competitive dynamics set the N:P threshold for N-fixation, it will be close to the N:P requirement of non-fixers (rather than that of N-fixers) and consequently so will the deep ocean N:P ratio. Theoretical limits on the N:P requirements of phytoplankton suggest that since the deep ocean became well oxygenated, its N:P has remained within the range 7.7–32.3. Decreases in phytoplankton C:P and N:P ratios over the past ~1 Gyr are predicted to have driven a decrease in deep ocean N:P, probably via increasing PO4. Even if Fe or light limitation restrict N-fixers to a fraction of the surface ocean, they reach higher densities there, minimising variations in deep ocean N:P. Thus Redfield's mechanism is robust and we expand it to suggest that phytoplankton C:N:P and deep ocean N:P have co-evolved.
U2 - 10.5194/bgd-3-1023-2006
DO - 10.5194/bgd-3-1023-2006
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 1023
EP - 1047
JO - Biogeosciences Discussions
JF - Biogeosciences Discussions
SN - 1810-6285
IS - 4
ER -