Collaborative diagnosis between clinician and patient: Why to do it and what to consider

Corinna Hackmann, Jon Wilson, Amorette Perkins, Hannah Zeilig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


This article discusses findings from the literature and our own research related to the experience of the diagnostic process in mental healthcare, primarily from the perspective of patients, and it focuses on the benefits of collaboration. A common finding throughout our research is that, if a diagnostic process is undertaken, the majority of patients want to be actively involved and feel valued in it. This helps ensure that they find the process and the resulting diagnosis to be meaningful, informative and useful. We believe that collaboration could also mitigate some of the reported negative unintended consequences of diagnosis, including feeling stigmatised, labelled and disempowered. Our work has led us to conceive of diagnosis as having two overarching elements: the diagnostic process and the resulting diagnostic label. This article focuses specifically on the diagnostic process; we do not consider here the debate surrounding the evidence base for the validity of psychiatric classification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-222
Number of pages9
JournalBJPsych Advances
Issue number4
Early online date17 Apr 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Cite this