TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining service design and discrete choice experiments for intervention design: An application to weather index insurance
AU - Dehmel, Naira
AU - Ran, Ylva
AU - Osborne, Matthew
AU - Verschoor, Arjan
AU - Lambe, Fiona
AU - Balungira, Joshua
AU - Tabacco, Giovanni
AU - Perez-Viana, Borja
AU - Widmark, Erik
AU - Holmlid, Stefan
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In this paper we provide a detailed description of the methodological steps involved in conducting a Service Design study in combination with Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs). It complements the conceptual and epistemological argument developed for this methodological combination in Osborne et al. (2021, World Development, in review WD-19535). Service Design for the co-creative development of policy interventions in complex adaptive systems involves an iterative process of moving between the six methodological stages of (1) problem co-definition, (2) actor-centred mapping, (3) experience-based problem diagnosis, (4) rapid prototyping, (5) design and testing and (6) upscaling. We suggest using DCEs as a quantitative method that is contextually adaptable and comparatively fast and cheap to implement, as part of stage (6) design and testing. Whilst both methods can operate independently with their own strengths and limitations, we find their combination to add value to the processes and outcomes of each. We illustrate the general methodological approach with a step-by-step description of its application to Weather Index Insurance in eastern Uganda.
AB - In this paper we provide a detailed description of the methodological steps involved in conducting a Service Design study in combination with Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs). It complements the conceptual and epistemological argument developed for this methodological combination in Osborne et al. (2021, World Development, in review WD-19535). Service Design for the co-creative development of policy interventions in complex adaptive systems involves an iterative process of moving between the six methodological stages of (1) problem co-definition, (2) actor-centred mapping, (3) experience-based problem diagnosis, (4) rapid prototyping, (5) design and testing and (6) upscaling. We suggest using DCEs as a quantitative method that is contextually adaptable and comparatively fast and cheap to implement, as part of stage (6) design and testing. Whilst both methods can operate independently with their own strengths and limitations, we find their combination to add value to the processes and outcomes of each. We illustrate the general methodological approach with a step-by-step description of its application to Weather Index Insurance in eastern Uganda.
KW - Climate insurance
KW - Combining Service Design Thinking and Discrete Choice Experiments
KW - Complex adaptive systems
KW - Design thinking
KW - Development programming
KW - Stated preference methodology
KW - Uganda
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116441968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101513
DO - 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101513
M3 - Article
VL - 8
JO - MethodsX
JF - MethodsX
SN - 2215-0161
M1 - 101513
ER -