Common humanity and shared destinies: Looking at the disability arts movement from an anthropological perspective

Andrea Stockl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article will bring together two strands of anthropological theories on art and artefacts, the disability arts movement and the phenomenological approach to the study of material things. All three of these different perspectives have one thing in common: they seek to understand entities – be they human or nonhuman – as defined by their agency and their intentionality. Looking at the disability arts movement, I will examine how the anthropology of art and agency, following Alfred Gell's theorem, is indeed the 'mobilisation of aesthetic principles in the course of social interaction', as Gell argued in Art and Agency. Art, thus, should be studied as a space in which agency, intention, causation, result and transformation are enacted and imagined. This has a striking resonance with debates within the disability arts movement, which suggests an affirmative model of disability and impairment, and in which art is seen as a tool to affirm, celebrate and transform rather than a way of expressing pain and sorrow. I will use case studies of Tanya Raabe-Webber's work and of artistic representations of the wheelchair in order to further explore these striking similarities and their potential to redefine the role of art in imagining the relationship between technology and personhood. I will finish by looking at Martin Heidegger's conceptualisation of the intentionality of things, as opposed to objects, and will apply this to some artwork rooted in the disability arts movement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-43
Number of pages8
JournalAnthropology in Action
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • affirmative model of disability; art and agency, disability arts movement, en-wheelment, impairment, phenomenology of art, United Kingdom

Cite this