Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D

Garry R. Barton, John Bankart, Adrian C. Davis, Quentin A. Summerfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)


Utility scores were estimated for 609 hearing-impaired adults who completed EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3) and SF-6D survey instruments both before and after being provided with a hearing aid. Pre-intervention, the mean utility scores for EQ-5D (0.80) and SF-6D (0.78) were significantly higher than the mean HUI3 utility score (0.58). Post-intervention, the mean improvement in the HUI3 (0.06 change) was significantly higher than the mean improvement according to the EQ-5D (0.01 change) or SF-6D (0.01 change). The estimated cost effectiveness of hearing-aid provision is therefore likely to be dependent on which instrument is used to measure utility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-105
Number of pages3
JournalApplied Health Economics and Health Policy
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Cite this