TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of fully coupled hydroelastic computation and segmented model test results for slamming and whipping loads
AU - Kim, Jung Hyun
AU - Kim, Yonghwan
AU - Korobkin, Alexander
N1 - © Society of Naval Architects of Korea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed.
AB - This paper presents a numerical analysis of slamming and whipping using a fully coupled hydroelastic model. The coupled model uses a 3-D Rankine panel method, a 1-D or 3-D finite element method, and a 2-D Generalized Wagner Model (GWM), which are strongly coupled in time domain. First, the GWM is validated against results of a free drop test of wedges. Second, the fully coupled method is validated against model test results for a 10,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) containership. Slamming pressures and whipping responses to regular waves are compared. A spatial distribution of local slamming forces is measured using 14 force sensors in the model test, and it is compared with the integration of the pressure distribution by the computation. Furthermore, the pressure is decomposed into the added mass, impact, and hydrostatic components, in the computational results. The validity and characteristics of the numerical model are discussed.
KW - Generalized wagner model (GWM)
KW - Hydroelasticity
KW - Rankine panel method
KW - Slamming
KW - Whipping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922328026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0231
DO - 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0231
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84922328026
VL - 6
SP - 1064
EP - 1081
JO - International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
JF - International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
SN - 2092-6782
IS - 4
ER -