Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: Methodological overview

Su Golder; Yoon K Loke; Martin Bland

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071813

Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: Methodological overview

Su Golder, Yoon K Loke, Martin Bland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A diverse range of study designs (e.g. case-control or cohort) are used in the evaluation of adverse effects. We aimed to ascertain whether the risk estimates from meta-analyses of case-control studies differ from that of other study designs.

Original language	English
Article number	e71813
Journal	PLoS One
Volume	8
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071813
Publication status	Published - 20 Aug 2013

Keywords

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Case-Control Studies
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Observational Study as Topic
Odds Ratio
Research Design
Risk Assessment

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pone.0071813Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{0e1f718fd4fc4bbeba7986b0f969c956,

title = "Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: Methodological overview",

abstract = "A diverse range of study designs (e.g. case-control or cohort) are used in the evaluation of adverse effects. We aimed to ascertain whether the risk estimates from meta-analyses of case-control studies differ from that of other study designs.",

keywords = "Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Case-Control Studies, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Observational Study as Topic, Odds Ratio, Research Design, Risk Assessment",

author = "Su Golder and Loke, {Yoon K} and Martin Bland",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 Golder et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",

year = "2013",

month = aug,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0071813",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

journal = "PLoS One",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of pooled risk estimates for adverse effects from different observational study designs: Methodological overview

AU - Golder, Su

AU - Loke, Yoon K

AU - Bland, Martin

N1 - © 2013 Golder et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2013/8/20

Y1 - 2013/8/20

N2 - A diverse range of study designs (e.g. case-control or cohort) are used in the evaluation of adverse effects. We aimed to ascertain whether the risk estimates from meta-analyses of case-control studies differ from that of other study designs.

AB - A diverse range of study designs (e.g. case-control or cohort) are used in the evaluation of adverse effects. We aimed to ascertain whether the risk estimates from meta-analyses of case-control studies differ from that of other study designs.

KW - Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

KW - Case-Control Studies

KW - Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

KW - Hormone Replacement Therapy

KW - Humans

KW - Meta-Analysis as Topic

KW - Observational Study as Topic

KW - Odds Ratio

KW - Research Design

KW - Risk Assessment

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0071813

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0071813

M3 - Article

C2 - 23977151

SN - 1932-6203

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

IS - 8

M1 - e71813

ER -