Abstract
Using a carefully designed series of public goods games, we compare, across monogamous and polygynous households, the willingness of husbands and wives to cooperate to maximize household gains. Compared to monogamous husbands and wives, polygynous husbands and wives are less cooperative, one with another, and co-wives are least cooperative, one with another. The husbands’ and wives’ behavior in a corresponding series of inter-household games indicates that these differences cannot be attributed to selection of less cooperative people into polygyny. Finally, behavior in polygynous households is more reciprocal and less apparently altruistic.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 266-283 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | American Economic Journal: Applied Economics |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | Dec 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
Keywords
- household resource allocation
- cooperative decision-making
- polygyny
- Nigeria
Profiles
-
Bereket Kebede
- School of Global Development - Professor in Behavioural Economics
- Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science - Member
- Behavioural and Experimental Development Economics - Member
- Gender and Development - Member
- Impact Evaluation - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research