Abstract
Abstract. This paper suggests that computer simulation modelling can offer opportunities for
redistributing expertise between science and affected publics in relation to environmental problems.
However, in order for scientific modelling to contribute to the coproduction of new knowledge
claims about environmental processes, scientists need to reposition themselves with respect to their
modelling practices. In the paper we examine a process in which two hydrological modellers
became part of an extended research collective generating new knowledge about flooding in a small
rural town in the UK. This process emerged in a project trialling a novel participatory research
apparatusöcompetency groupsöaiming to harness the energy generated in public controversy and
enable other than scientific expertise to contribute to environmental knowledge. Analysing the
process repositioning the scientists in terms of a dynamic of `dissociation' and `attachment', we map
the ways in which prevailing alignments of expertise were unravelled and new connections assembled,
in relation to the matter of concern. We show how the redistribution of knowledge and skills in the
extended research collective resulted in a new computer model, embodying the coproduced flood risk
knowledge.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1617–1633 |
Journal | Environment & Planning A |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |