Correction: Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January)

K. Hopayian; M. Mugford

Correction: Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	840
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of General Practice
Volume	49
Issue number	447
Publication status	Published - 1999

Cite this

@article{24226cde3b074708b1ddb0a26cb7144f,

title = "Correction: Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January)",

author = "K. Hopayian and M. Mugford",

year = "1999",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "840",

journal = "British Journal of General Practice",

issn = "0960-1643",

publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

number = "447",

}

Correction: Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January). / Hopayian, K.; Mugford, M.
In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 49, No. 447, 1999, p. 840.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction

T2 - Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January)

AU - Hopayian, K.

AU - Mugford, M.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032830307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0032830307

SN - 0960-1643

VL - 49

SP - 840

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

IS - 447

ER -

Correction: Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? (British Journal of General Practice (1999) January)

Other files and links

Cite this