Abstract
Aim: This national survey aimed to evaluate the adoption and implementation of delivery room cuddles (DRC) for preterm infants (<32 weeks’ gestation) in neonatal units across the UK. We sought to determine the extent of the practice, and understand the consistency and challenges associated with DRC, with the goal of enhancing care for preterm infants.
Methods: Between January and March 2024, all UK level 2 and 3 neonatal units were invited to complete a structured survey on DRC practices. We collected data on the existence, frequency and facilitation of DRC, as well as any institutional guidelines and barriers for its practice.
Results: We received complete responses from all 131 centres invited (100% response rate). Among these, 60 centres (45.8%) reported routinely practising DRC, 66 (50.4%) did so occasionally and 5 (3.8%) reported not practising DRC at all. Notably, 81 centres (61.8%) practised DRC without formal institutional guidelines. Main barriers to practice included equipment limitations, varying staff attitudes, and concerns about the clinical condition of preterm infants.
Conclusion: This survey demonstrates an encouraging high uptake of DRC in recent years, typically offered after initial stabilisation (within 30–60 min post-birth). Despite the recognised benefits of DRC to parents and in enhancing neonatal outcomes, considerable variability remains in its implementation underscoring the need for comprehensive guidelines and professional training. These could standardise DRC practices across the UK, promoting more consistent and effective care for preterm infants.
Methods: Between January and March 2024, all UK level 2 and 3 neonatal units were invited to complete a structured survey on DRC practices. We collected data on the existence, frequency and facilitation of DRC, as well as any institutional guidelines and barriers for its practice.
Results: We received complete responses from all 131 centres invited (100% response rate). Among these, 60 centres (45.8%) reported routinely practising DRC, 66 (50.4%) did so occasionally and 5 (3.8%) reported not practising DRC at all. Notably, 81 centres (61.8%) practised DRC without formal institutional guidelines. Main barriers to practice included equipment limitations, varying staff attitudes, and concerns about the clinical condition of preterm infants.
Conclusion: This survey demonstrates an encouraging high uptake of DRC in recent years, typically offered after initial stabilisation (within 30–60 min post-birth). Despite the recognised benefits of DRC to parents and in enhancing neonatal outcomes, considerable variability remains in its implementation underscoring the need for comprehensive guidelines and professional training. These could standardise DRC practices across the UK, promoting more consistent and effective care for preterm infants.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e003782 |
| Journal | BMJ Paediatrics Open |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Feb 2026 |
Keywords
- Infant
- Neonatology
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver