Development, post-, anti-, and populist: A critical review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The notion and practice of development have been severely critiqued from both modernist and postmodernist perspectives, yet the global development industry flourishes. The latter have afforded important insights, but also suffer from unexamined ideological agendas, a disinclination to undertake detailed research into development processes and policy, a preoccupation with texts and representations by the development industry, and from perpetuating an indulgent and agenda-less academic cul-de-sac. Instead, the postmodern critique of development could lead to a more politically astute and practical reconstruction of certain aspects of 'development', particularly in the neopopulist mode of developmentalism. Three powerful development paradigms are identified, and the ways in which they are constructed, promoted, and adapted are discussed in the light of conflicting modernist and postmodern accounts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1050
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume32
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2000

Cite this