Divergence in DNACPR and resuscitation policies- Institutional survey in England

Emily Fitton, Karen Chumbley, Caroline Barry, Aneta Bartova, Ben Troke, Wayne Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to analyse the policies of hospitals and care homes in England as regards the use of do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) recommendations. We sought to identify (i) variations among policies at different institutions, and (ii) divergence of local policies from national guidance, particularly with reference to decisions either (a) to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) despite the presence of a DNACPR recommendation, or (b) not to initiate CPR in the absence of a DNACPR recommendation. Methods: We conducted a survey of 14 DNACPR and/or resuscitation policies, drawn from care homes, NHS trusts and hospices. Results: Many of the policies we surveyed diverge significantly from national guidance. Some require that CPR be administered in all cases where no DNACPR recommendation has been made. Others fail to specify that CPR may be appropriate even in the presence of a DNACPR recommendation. Conclusions: Local DNACPR policies currently place both patients and healthcare professionals at significant risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)835-841
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume15
Issue number6
Early online date3 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Advance Care Planning
  • End of life care

Cite this