Abstract
This paper assesses Thaler and Sunstein’s claim that policies that nudge individuals towards healthy lifestyles promote the welfare of those individuals, as judged by themselves. I argue that Thaler and Sunstein switch between two different interpretations of that clause. One interpretation gives the clause a wide range of applicability, but drains it of its content as a repudiation of paternalism. The other interpretation makes it more meaningful to say that people want to make the choices they are being nudged towards, but applies to a much narrower range of cases than Thaler and Sunstein have in mind.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113–123 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Review of Economics |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 20 Sept 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- nudges
- health
- paternalism
- self-control
Profiles
-
Robert Sugden
- School of Economics - Professor of Economics
- Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science - Member
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Behavioural Economics - Member
- Economic Theory - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching and Research
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Reconstructing normative economics on a foundation of mutual advantage
Sugden, R., Isoni, A. & Zheng, J.
1/01/16 → 30/06/21
Project: Research
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver