TY - JOUR
T1 - Documenting the recovery of vascular services in European centres following the initial COVID-19 pandemic peak: Results from a multicentre collaborative study
AU - Ruffino, Maria Antonella
AU - Chan, Sharon
AU - Coughlin, Patrick
AU - Awopetu, Ayoola
AU - Stather, Philip
AU - Lane, Tristan
AU - Theodosiou, Dimitrios
AU - Ahmed, Mohamed Abozeid
AU - Vasudevan, Thodur
AU - Ibrahim, Mohammed
AU - Al Maadany, Faraj
AU - Eljareh, Mohamed
AU - Alkhafeefi, Fatimah Saad
AU - Coscas, Raphael
AU - Ünal, Ertekin Utku
AU - Pulli, Raffaele
AU - Zacà, Sergio
AU - Angiletta, Domenico
AU - Kotsis, Thomas
AU - Moawad, Magdy
AU - Tozzi, Matteo
AU - Patelis, Nikolaos
AU - Lazaris, Andreas M.
AU - Chuen, Jason
AU - Croo, Alexander
AU - Tsolaki, Elpiniki
AU - Zenunaj, Gladiol
AU - Kamal, Dhafer
AU - Tolba, Mahmoud M. H.
AU - Maresch, Martin
AU - Khetarpaul, Vipul
AU - Mills, Joseph
AU - Gangwani, Gaurav
AU - Elahwal, Mohamed
AU - Khalil, Rana
AU - Azab, Mohammed A.
AU - Mahomed, Anver
AU - Whiston, Richard
AU - Contractor, Ummul
AU - Esposito, Davide
AU - Pratesi, Carlo
AU - Giacomelli, Elena
AU - Troncoso, Martín Veras
AU - Johnson, Adam
AU - Bell, Rachel
AU - Bradley, Nicholas
AU - Al-Jundi, Wissam
AU - Meyer, Felicity
AU - Bennett, Lisa
AU - Davies, Emma
AU - The VERN COVER study collaborative
N1 - Funding Information: The study has received financial grant support from the Circulation Foundation (Vascular charity, no grant reference). The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) has provided salary support for the co-chief investigators (reference: NIHR000359) and co-study leads (reference: NIHR202011). The funders have not played any role in study design, analysis, or writing of the report.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To document the recovery of vascular services in Europe following the first COVID-19 pandemic peak. Methods: An online structured vascular service survey with repeated data entry between 23 March and 9 August 2020 was carried out. Unit level data were collected using repeated questionnaires addressing modifications to vascular services during the first peak (March – May 2020, “period 1”), and then again between May and June (“period 2”) and June and July 2020 (“period 3”). The duration of each period was similar. From 2 June, as reductions in cases began to be reported, centres were first asked if they were in a region still affected by rising cases, or if they had passed the peak of the first wave. These centres were asked additional questions about adaptations made to their standard pathways to permit elective surgery to resume. Results: The impact of the pandemic continued to be felt well after countries’ first peak was thought to have passed in 2020. Aneurysm screening had not returned to normal in 21.7% of centres. Carotid surgery was still offered on a case by case basis in 33.8% of centres, and only 52.9% of centres had returned to their normal aneurysm threshold for surgery. Half of centres (49.4%) believed their management of lower limb ischaemia continued to be negatively affected by the pandemic. Reduced operating theatre capacity continued in 45.5% of centres. Twenty per cent of responding centres documented a backlog of at least 20 aortic repairs. At least one negative swab and 14 days of isolation were the most common strategies used for permitting safe elective surgery to recommence. Conclusion: Centres reported a broad return of services approaching pre-pandemic “normal” by July 2020. Many introduced protocols to manage peri-operative COVID-19 risk. Backlogs in cases were reported for all major vascular surgeries.
AB - Objective: To document the recovery of vascular services in Europe following the first COVID-19 pandemic peak. Methods: An online structured vascular service survey with repeated data entry between 23 March and 9 August 2020 was carried out. Unit level data were collected using repeated questionnaires addressing modifications to vascular services during the first peak (March – May 2020, “period 1”), and then again between May and June (“period 2”) and June and July 2020 (“period 3”). The duration of each period was similar. From 2 June, as reductions in cases began to be reported, centres were first asked if they were in a region still affected by rising cases, or if they had passed the peak of the first wave. These centres were asked additional questions about adaptations made to their standard pathways to permit elective surgery to resume. Results: The impact of the pandemic continued to be felt well after countries’ first peak was thought to have passed in 2020. Aneurysm screening had not returned to normal in 21.7% of centres. Carotid surgery was still offered on a case by case basis in 33.8% of centres, and only 52.9% of centres had returned to their normal aneurysm threshold for surgery. Half of centres (49.4%) believed their management of lower limb ischaemia continued to be negatively affected by the pandemic. Reduced operating theatre capacity continued in 45.5% of centres. Twenty per cent of responding centres documented a backlog of at least 20 aortic repairs. At least one negative swab and 14 days of isolation were the most common strategies used for permitting safe elective surgery to recommence. Conclusion: Centres reported a broad return of services approaching pre-pandemic “normal” by July 2020. Many introduced protocols to manage peri-operative COVID-19 risk. Backlogs in cases were reported for all major vascular surgeries.
KW - AAA
KW - COVID-19
KW - PAD
KW - Survey
KW - Vascular surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143657533&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.10.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143657533
VL - 57
SP - 28
EP - 34
JO - EJVES Vascular Forum
JF - EJVES Vascular Forum
SN - 2666-688X
ER -