Abstract
Cronyism in firms arises when favoritism toward an ingroup affects personnel decisions. Two main motives underlie cronyism: profit, if an ingroup employee works harder; or altruism, if used to transfer resources. In a lab-experiment trust game with naturally-occurring groups, an employer (proposer) faces an employee (responder) who is or is not an ingroup member. We see that both motives play a role. Cronyism is more likely from employers who are more altruistic to the ingroup in a dictator game; and even low-productivity (by design) ingroup members reciprocate trust generously. Cronyism pays for those who engage in it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1092-1110 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Economic Inquiry |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 6 Apr 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- Cronyism
- Group Identity
- Ingroup
- Discrimination
- Trust
- Reciprocity
- Lab Experiment
- trust
- group identity
- lab experiment
- reciprocity
- cronyism
- discrimination
- ingroup