Does government performance matter? The effects of local government on urban outcomes in England

Stephen Greasley, Peter John, Harold Wolman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper applies an extensive literature that argues that political leadership and local government activity enhance urban performance. Using the State of the Cities Database of 56 Primary Urban Areas in England, it tests for the impact of consolidated governance, political stability, planning performance, average service performance, local government capacity and planning development expenditure on jobs and population growth from 1995 to 2005. The regression analysis finds that the competence of service delivery is weakly associated with full-time jobs growth and that a consolidated governance structure is weakly associated with greater population growth. None of the other tests is statistically significant. Overall, the findings place doubt on the salience of the political determinants of economic performance in English cities for the period in question.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1835-1851
Number of pages17
JournalUrban Studies
Volume48
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this