Abstract
Complexity science literature abounds with anecdotes from the life sciences. Ants, termites, birds, and bees have been a popular choiceof metaphor and provided inspiration in the development of simulations beneficial to learning and technological development. Recently, however, references like these seem to have dwindled. Perhaps through the overuse of anecdotes regarding such social insects, ants and termites have lost their impact and appeal, become clichéd, and, for some, even the subject of derision. But is their possible fall from grace fair? Recent research suggests not. This paper argues in favor of ants, termites, birds, and bees, presenting findings from a year-long study engaging 13 participants in interviews and the writing of qualitative diaries, showing that ants, among other species, do have a place. That place is wrapped up in the emotional and intellectual experience of individuals' learning about and developing an interest in complexity science.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 184-193 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | E:CO Emergence: Complexity and Organization |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |