Abstract
This research examines the degree to which legislators respond to their districts by analyzing immigration-related legislative speeches from the Swedish parliament (2005-2016). Using a text-scaling method, we find that the immigration discourse fluctuates between `socio-economic responsibility' and `cultural difference' poles. We argue that socio-economic declines and extreme-right party success serve as an indication to MPs that there is demand for `cultural difference' rhetoric on immigration. Our statistical analyses support the argument and demonstrate that district-level economic declines can lead to an increase in the salience of cultural framing of migrants, especially in districts with a higher share of foreign residents. We also find that district-level extreme-right electoral success has a significant influence on legislative immigration discourse. Overall, the results have implications for studies of legislative texts, dyadic representation, and the impact of the populist right on legislative politics in Europe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 649-679 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Legislative Studies Quarterly |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 22 Oct 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Profiles
-
Eitan Tzelgov
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Associate Professor in Politics
- Politics & International Relations - Member
Person: Academic, Teaching and Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver