Economist-kings? A critical notice on Caplan, The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Caplan’s The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies has been received by rave reviews. These reviews appear to have failed to note that Caplan’s book celebrates the market and denigrates democracy at the very time when markets worldwide have failed and democracies have ridden to the rescue. It thus appears to have been undermined fatally by events that occurred as it was published (and which Caplan artfully omits to mention in the more recent paperback edition). Caplan’s book in fact stands in the long tradition of anti-democratic writings that argue that an elite must rule. An elite of free-market economists. An elite no longer in good odour, since the financial crisis (and the climate crisis) occurred and became starkly evident to all. This Critical Notice also points out that numerous of Caplan’s key claims, such as that individual voters have zero effect on election results, are empirically false.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-129
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Review
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Keywords

  • democracy
  • election
  • elite politics
  • literature review
  • policy approach
  • political economy
  • voting behaviour

Cite this