Abstract
This chapter offers advice on how the conservation science community can effectively engage with decision-makers. The rationales for why we, as scientists, need to do this have been widely discussed in the literature. Often, the reasons offered are normative, pragmatic, or instrumental (de Vente, 2016); in other words, there is a belief that engaging with decision-makers leads to better informed, more acceptable decisions. Indeed, better engagement may lead to the greater uptake of evidence for conservation decisions, something which some scholars argue is a priority for effective management (e.g. Gardner et al., 2018; Sutherland and Wordley, 2017).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Conservation Research, Policy and Practice |
Editors | William J. Sutherland, Peter N. M. Brotherton, Zoe G. Davies, Nancy Ockendon, Nathalie Pettorelli, Juliet A. Vickery |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Chapter | 10 |
Pages | 162-182 |
Number of pages | 21 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108638210 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- adaptive management
- conservation
- decision-making
- evidence
- management planning
- monitoring
- practitioners