Abstract
The effects of an indirect dopamine-agonist, d-amphetamine, and a non-selective dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, were investigated in normal male volunteers using a between-subjects double-blind design in a procedural learning task, thought mainly to involve unconscious/automatic learning. The results showed: (1) d-amphetamine facilitated response speed, whereas haloperidol inhibited it, in comparison to placebo; (2) the linear increase in procedural learning corresponded with pharmacological manipulation of degree of dopaminergic activity, i.e. subjects given haloperidol showed the least, and subjects given d-amphetamine the greatest, procedural learning. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to investigation of abnormalities of procedural learning processes in schizophrenia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-276 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Psychopharmacology |
| Volume | 129 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 1997 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Dextroamphetamine
- Dopamine Agonists
- Dopamine Antagonists
- Haloperidol
- Humans
- Learning
- Male
- Middle Aged
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver