Engagement with stop smoking services after referral or signposting: A mixed methods study

Ian Pope, Simrun Rashid, Hassan Iqbal, Pippa Belderson, Emma Ward, Lucy Clark, Tom Conway, Susan Stirling, Allan Clark, Sanjay Agrawal, Linda Bauld, Caitlin Notley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Screening for smoking when people interact with healthcare services and referral of those who smoke to stop smoking services (SSSs) is a key component of efforts to tackle tobacco use. However, little is known about what happens after someone is referred or signposted to SSSs.

Methods: As part of the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (NCT04854616), those randomised to intervention (n= 505) were referred to local SSSs (along with receiving brief advice and an e-cigarette starter kit) and those randomised to control (n= 502) were given contact details for the same services (signposted). SSS engagement data was collected: 1) directly from participants and 2) from SSS, additional qualitative data came from 33 participant interviews.

Results: Engagement with SSSs was very low. 3.2% (n=16) of those in the intervention group and 2.4% (n=12) in the control group reported attending a one-to-one support session. From SSS data, engagement was also low with 8.9% (n=43) of those referred engaging and 3.1% (n=15) going on to quit with SSS support. The majority of the 24 intervention participants interviewed did not recall being contacted by an SSS.

Conclusion: Referral or signposting to stop smoking services within an Emergency Department based trial resulted in very low levels of engagement. Barriers to engagement identified included participants not being contacted by SSSs and the support offered not meeting their needs.

Implications: Referral or signposting of those who smoke to Stop smoking services from the Emergency Department resulted in low rates of engagement in this large multi-centre randomised controlled trial. In order to better support those who smoke it may be more effective for smoking cessation advice to be offered ‘in the moment’ within clinical settings, and follow-up to be proactively offered rather than relying on people being motivated to contact the services themselves or engaging when contacted.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Early online date3 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jul 2024

Cite this