TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluating a Mixed-Initiative Authoring Environment
T2 - 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2005
AU - Ainsworth, Shaaron
AU - Fleming, Piers
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2005 The authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - The REDEEM authoring tool allows teachers to create adapted learning environments for their students from existing material. Previous evaluations have shown that under experimental conditions REDEEM can significantly improve learning. The goals of this study were twofold: to explore if REDEEM could improve students' learning in real world situations and to examine if learners can share in the authoring decisions. REDEEM was used to create 10 courses from existing lectures that taught undergraduate statistics. An experimenter performed the content authoring and then created student categories and tutorial strategies that learners chose for themselves. All first-year psychology students were offered the opportunity to learn with REDEEM: 90 used REDEEM at least once but 77 did not. Students also completed a pre-test, 3 attitude questionnaires and their final exam was used as a post-test. Learning with REDEEM was associated with significantly better exam scores, and this remains true even when attempting to control for increased effort or ability of REDEEM users. Students explored a variety of categories and strategies, rating their option to choose this as moderately important. Consequently, whilst there is no direct evidence that allowing students this control enhanced performance, it seems likely that it increased uptake of the system.
AB - The REDEEM authoring tool allows teachers to create adapted learning environments for their students from existing material. Previous evaluations have shown that under experimental conditions REDEEM can significantly improve learning. The goals of this study were twofold: to explore if REDEEM could improve students' learning in real world situations and to examine if learners can share in the authoring decisions. REDEEM was used to create 10 courses from existing lectures that taught undergraduate statistics. An experimenter performed the content authoring and then created student categories and tutorial strategies that learners chose for themselves. All first-year psychology students were offered the opportunity to learn with REDEEM: 90 used REDEEM at least once but 77 did not. Students also completed a pre-test, 3 attitude questionnaires and their final exam was used as a post-test. Learning with REDEEM was associated with significantly better exam scores, and this remains true even when attempting to control for increased effort or ability of REDEEM users. Students explored a variety of categories and strategies, rating their option to choose this as moderately important. Consequently, whilst there is no direct evidence that allowing students this control enhanced performance, it seems likely that it increased uptake of the system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746357428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33746357428
T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
SP - 9
EP - 16
BT - Artificial Intelligence in Education
A2 - Looi, Chee-Kit
A2 - McCalla, Gord
A2 - Bredeweg, Bert
A2 - Breuker, Joost
PB - IOS Press
Y2 - 18 July 2005 through 22 July 2005
ER -