Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling

Nicky McCreesh; Simon D. W. Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N. Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L. Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G. Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J. Copas; Richard J. Hayes; Richard G. White

doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c

Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling

Nicky McCreesh, Simon D. W. Frost, Janet Seeley, Joseph Katongole, Matilda N. Tarsh, Richard Ndunguse, Fatima Jichi, Natasha L. Lunel, Dermot Maher, Lisa G. Johnston, Pam Sonnenberg, Andrew J. Copas, Richard J. Hayes, Richard G. White

School of Global Development

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

223 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling produced a generally representative sample of this well-connected nonhidden population. However, current respondent-driven sampling inference methods failed to reduce bias when it occurred. Whether the data required to remove bias and measure precision can be collected in a respondent-driven sampling survey is unresolved. Respondent-driven sampling should be regarded as a (potentially superior) form of convenience sampling method, and caution is required when interpreting findings based on the sampling method.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	138-147
Number of pages	10
Journal	Epidemiology
Volume	23
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c

Cite this

@article{26f88899ee4b4d45a98cf0a17fb83ff3,

title = "Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling",

abstract = "Respondent-driven sampling produced a generally representative sample of this well-connected nonhidden population. However, current respondent-driven sampling inference methods failed to reduce bias when it occurred. Whether the data required to remove bias and measure precision can be collected in a respondent-driven sampling survey is unresolved. Respondent-driven sampling should be regarded as a (potentially superior) form of convenience sampling method, and caution is required when interpreting findings based on the sampling method.",

author = "Nicky McCreesh and Frost, {Simon D. W.} and Janet Seeley and Joseph Katongole and Tarsh, {Matilda N.} and Richard Ndunguse and Fatima Jichi and Lunel, {Natasha L.} and Dermot Maher and Johnston, {Lisa G.} and Pam Sonnenberg and Copas, {Andrew J.} and Hayes, {Richard J.} and White, {Richard G.}",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "138--147",

journal = "Epidemiology",

issn = "1044-3983",

publisher = "Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling

AU - McCreesh, Nicky

AU - Frost, Simon D. W.

AU - Seeley, Janet

AU - Katongole, Joseph

AU - Tarsh, Matilda N.

AU - Ndunguse, Richard

AU - Jichi, Fatima

AU - Lunel, Natasha L.

AU - Maher, Dermot

AU - Johnston, Lisa G.

AU - Sonnenberg, Pam

AU - Copas, Andrew J.

AU - Hayes, Richard J.

AU - White, Richard G.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Respondent-driven sampling produced a generally representative sample of this well-connected nonhidden population. However, current respondent-driven sampling inference methods failed to reduce bias when it occurred. Whether the data required to remove bias and measure precision can be collected in a respondent-driven sampling survey is unresolved. Respondent-driven sampling should be regarded as a (potentially superior) form of convenience sampling method, and caution is required when interpreting findings based on the sampling method.

AB - Respondent-driven sampling produced a generally representative sample of this well-connected nonhidden population. However, current respondent-driven sampling inference methods failed to reduce bias when it occurred. Whether the data required to remove bias and measure precision can be collected in a respondent-driven sampling survey is unresolved. Respondent-driven sampling should be regarded as a (potentially superior) form of convenience sampling method, and caution is required when interpreting findings based on the sampling method.

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c

M3 - Article

SN - 1044-3983

VL - 23

SP - 138

EP - 147

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

IS - 1

ER -