Exception reporting as a quality marker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	315
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of General Practice
Volume	63
Issue number	611
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X668276
Publication status	Published - Jun 2013

Access to Document

@article{156aa0c9006f4560a7a3cc845e7bc654,

title = "Exception reporting as a quality marker",

author = "Kevork Hopayian",

year = "2013",

month = jun,

doi = "10.3399/bjgp13X668276",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

pages = "315",

journal = "British Journal of General Practice",

issn = "0960-1643",

publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

number = "611",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exception reporting as a quality marker

AU - Hopayian, Kevork

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893402446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp13X668276

DO - 10.3399/bjgp13X668276

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 23735393

AN - SCOPUS:84893402446

VL - 63

SP - 315

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 611

ER -