Eyes as Windows to Minds: Psycholinguistics for Experimental Philosophy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Psycholinguistic methods hold great promise for experimental philosophy. Many philosophical thought experiments and arguments proceed from verbal descriptions of possible cases. Many relevant intuitions and conclusions are driven by spontaneous inferences about what else must also be true in the cases described. Such inferences are continually made in language comprehension and production. This chapter explains how methods from psycholinguistics can be employed to study such routine automatic inferences, with a view to assessing intuitions and reconstructing arguments. We demonstrate how plausibility ratings, pupillometry, and reading time measurements can be used to examine hypotheses about automatic inferences in speech and text comprehension. Two experiments on inferences from polysemous (perception-)verbs provide evidence of a potentially consequential ‘salience bias’. Findings help assess intuitions about unusual cases and analyse a philosophical paradox (‘argument from hallucination’). The paper thus illustrates how we can adapt psycholinguistic methods for philosophical purposes and demonstrates the methods’ philosophical usefulness.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMethodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy
EditorsEugen Fischer, Mark Curtis
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Pages43-100
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781350068995
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2019

Cite this