Abstract
Religion is becoming an increasingly important factor for theorists and policy makers alike in the consideration of United States foreign policy. In recent years a new school of faith-based diplomacy advocacy has emerged and begun to resonate with foreign policy practitioners. This article examines the efficacy of such faith-based approaches to foreign policy problems with a religious component and argues that such an approach is inherently flawed. The article argues that a combination of a distinct military culture, which feels itself morally superior to its civilian leadership and the activism of conservative evangelicals in the chaplaincy and military leadership makes such faith-based approaches unrealistic. While acknowledging a role for pluralist religious actors in foreign policy the article rejects a faith-based advocacy approach which can exacerbate rather than resolve foreign policy problems.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 475-498 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Politics and Religion |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 03 |
Early online date | 6 Sep 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 2014 |
Profiles
-
Lee Marsden
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Emeritus Professor
- Area Studies - Member
- Political, Social and International Studies - Member
Person: Honorary, Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research