Abstract
Religion is becoming an increasingly important factor for theorists and policy makers alike in the consideration of United States foreign policy. In recent years a new school of faith-based diplomacy advocacy has emerged and begun to resonate with foreign policy practitioners. This article examines the efficacy of such faith-based approaches to foreign policy problems with a religious component and argues that such an approach is inherently flawed. The article argues that a combination of a distinct military culture, which feels itself morally superior to its civilian leadership and the activism of conservative evangelicals in the chaplaincy and military leadership makes such faith-based approaches unrealistic. While acknowledging a role for pluralist religious actors in foreign policy the article rejects a faith-based advocacy approach which can exacerbate rather than resolve foreign policy problems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 475-498 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Politics and Religion |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 03 |
| Early online date | 6 Sept 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2014 |
Profiles
-
Lee Marsden
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Emeritus Professor
- Area Studies - Member
- Politics & International Relations - Member
Person: Honorary, Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching and Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver