Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: Predictors and consequences

Wendy Hardeman (Lead Author), Susan Michie, Tom Fanshawe, A. Toby Prevost, Katharine McLoughlin, Ann Louise Kinmonth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing fidelity of behavioural interventions is important, but demanding and rarely done. This study assessed adherence to behaviour change techniques used in an intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary adults (ProActive; N = 365). Transcripts of 108 sessions with a sub-sample of 27 participants were assessed. An independent assessor coded adherence of four 'facilitators' who delivered the intervention to 208 protocol-specified facilitator behaviours (e.g. 'elicit perceived advantages of becoming more active') in four key sessions. Four raters classified the 208 behaviours under 14 techniques (e.g., goal setting, use of rewards) to enable calculation of adherence to techniques. Observed adherence to techniques across participants was modest (median 44%, IQR 35-62%), and lower than that reported by facilitators. Adherence differed between facilitators (range: 26-63%) and decreased across the four sessions (mean drop 9% per session, 95% confidence interval 7-11%). In this small sample facilitator adherence was unrelated to (change in) participants' physical activity or its cognitive predictors: Attitudes, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and intention. Future research should investigate causal pathways between fidelity indicators and outcomes in larger samples and develop and test less intensive measures of fidelity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-24
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date14 Dec 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Behaviour change techniques
  • Fidelity
  • Intervention studies
  • Physical activity

Cite this