Abstract
United Airlines, Inc v Jeremy Cooperstock (2017) FC 616 (Untied.com), 23 June 2017
In its Untied.com decision of 23 June 2017 the Canadian Federal Court confirmed the lack of a parody exception in trade mark law (Trade-Marks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13) and denied the applicability of the parody exception in copyright law (section 29 of the Copyright Act 1985, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) on grounds of confusion.
In its Untied.com decision of 23 June 2017 the Canadian Federal Court confirmed the lack of a parody exception in trade mark law (Trade-Marks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13) and denied the applicability of the parody exception in copyright law (section 29 of the Copyright Act 1985, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) on grounds of confusion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 895–896 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 13 Sep 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2017 |