From neoliberalism to pluralism: A response to Mulheirn and Jacobs

Alan Finlayson

doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x

From neoliberalism to pluralism: A response to Mulheirn and Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

This essay puts into context the debate between Michael Jacobs and Ian Mulheirn, exploring the theories and themes underpinning their arguments, published in issue 84 1 of the Political Quarterly. It discusses, firstly, the roots of Mulheirn's approach in European neoliberalism and, secondly, the roots of Jacobs' approach in a range of sources currently contending for authority over debates within the Labour party. These include themes drawn, broadly, from Polanyi, Keynes, Schumpeter and Schumacher. In a conclusion the article makes the case for a ‘pluralistic’ to the organisation of political and economic power in the UK.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	211–217
Number of pages	7
Journal	The Political Quarterly
Volume	84
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x
Publication status	Published - Jul 2013

Keywords

neoliberalism
ideology
British Politics

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x

Cite this

@article{98a04e35c8c34c3882316ba57daa0c8e,

title = "From neoliberalism to pluralism: A response to Mulheirn and Jacobs",

abstract = "This essay puts into context the debate between Michael Jacobs and Ian Mulheirn, exploring the theories and themes underpinning their arguments, published in issue 84 1 of the Political Quarterly. It discusses, firstly, the roots of Mulheirn's approach in European neoliberalism and, secondly, the roots of Jacobs' approach in a range of sources currently contending for authority over debates within the Labour party. These include themes drawn, broadly, from Polanyi, Keynes, Schumpeter and Schumacher. In a conclusion the article makes the case for a {\textquoteleft}pluralistic{\textquoteright} to the organisation of political and economic power in the UK.",

keywords = "neoliberalism, ideology, British Politics",

author = "Alan Finlayson",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "211–217",

journal = "The Political Quarterly",

issn = "0032-3179",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From neoliberalism to pluralism: A response to Mulheirn and Jacobs

AU - Finlayson, Alan

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - This essay puts into context the debate between Michael Jacobs and Ian Mulheirn, exploring the theories and themes underpinning their arguments, published in issue 84 1 of the Political Quarterly. It discusses, firstly, the roots of Mulheirn's approach in European neoliberalism and, secondly, the roots of Jacobs' approach in a range of sources currently contending for authority over debates within the Labour party. These include themes drawn, broadly, from Polanyi, Keynes, Schumpeter and Schumacher. In a conclusion the article makes the case for a ‘pluralistic’ to the organisation of political and economic power in the UK.

AB - This essay puts into context the debate between Michael Jacobs and Ian Mulheirn, exploring the theories and themes underpinning their arguments, published in issue 84 1 of the Political Quarterly. It discusses, firstly, the roots of Mulheirn's approach in European neoliberalism and, secondly, the roots of Jacobs' approach in a range of sources currently contending for authority over debates within the Labour party. These include themes drawn, broadly, from Polanyi, Keynes, Schumpeter and Schumacher. In a conclusion the article makes the case for a ‘pluralistic’ to the organisation of political and economic power in the UK.

KW - neoliberalism

KW - ideology

KW - British Politics

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.12018.x

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 84

SP - 211

EP - 217

JO - The Political Quarterly

JF - The Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

IS - 2

ER -