TY - JOUR
T1 - From sequence to function
T2 - Insights from natural variation in budding yeasts
AU - Nieduszynski, Conrad A.
AU - Liti, Gianni
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Prof. E. Louis and Dr J. Warringer for critical reading of the manuscript. The authors' work is funded by The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant numbers BB/E023754/1 , BB/G001596/1 and BB/F015216/1 ).
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - Background: Natural variation offers a powerful approach for assigning function to DNA sequence-a pressing challenge in the age of high throughput sequencing technologies. Scope of Review: Here we review comparative genomic approaches that are bridging the sequence-function and genotype-phenotype gaps. Reverse genomic approaches aim to analyse sequence to assign function, whereas forward genomic approaches start from a phenotype and aim to identify the underlying genotype responsible. Major Conclusions: Comparative genomic approaches, pioneered in budding yeasts, have resulted in dramatic improvements in our understanding of the function of both genes and regulatory sequences. Analogous studies in other systems, including humans, demonstrate the ubiquity of comparative genomic approaches. Recently, forward genomic approaches, exploiting natural variation within yeast populations, have started to offer powerful insights into how genotype influences phenotype and even the ability to predict phenotypes. General Significance: Comparative genomic experiments are defining the fundamental rules that govern complex traits in natural populations from yeast to humans. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Systems Biology of Microorganisms.
AB - Background: Natural variation offers a powerful approach for assigning function to DNA sequence-a pressing challenge in the age of high throughput sequencing technologies. Scope of Review: Here we review comparative genomic approaches that are bridging the sequence-function and genotype-phenotype gaps. Reverse genomic approaches aim to analyse sequence to assign function, whereas forward genomic approaches start from a phenotype and aim to identify the underlying genotype responsible. Major Conclusions: Comparative genomic approaches, pioneered in budding yeasts, have resulted in dramatic improvements in our understanding of the function of both genes and regulatory sequences. Analogous studies in other systems, including humans, demonstrate the ubiquity of comparative genomic approaches. Recently, forward genomic approaches, exploiting natural variation within yeast populations, have started to offer powerful insights into how genotype influences phenotype and even the ability to predict phenotypes. General Significance: Comparative genomic experiments are defining the fundamental rules that govern complex traits in natural populations from yeast to humans. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Systems Biology of Microorganisms.
KW - Comparative genomics
KW - Forward genomics
KW - Functional analysis
KW - Quantitative trait locus
KW - Reverse genomics
KW - Saccharomyces cerevisiae
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052048400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.02.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21320572
AN - SCOPUS:80052048400
VL - 1810
SP - 959
EP - 966
JO - Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-General Subjects
JF - Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-General Subjects
SN - 0304-4165
IS - 10
ER -