Abstract
The consideration of gambling as a decision-making disorder may fail to explain why the majority of people gamble, yet only a small percentage of people lose control of their behaviour to the point where their gambling becomes problematic. The application of dual process theories to gambling addiction offers a means of explaining the differences between “normal” and “problem” gambling, augmenting the multiple vulnerabilities proposed by Redish et al.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 444-445 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 29 Jul 2008 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |