Abstract
So-called ‘generics’ are members of a diverse class of constructions that express generalisations that do not directly involve any precise cardinality of individuals, but rather the kinds or ‘typical’ or ‘normal’ members of the kinds contributed by arguments of the predicate. The paper argues that genericity as a unitary phenomenon of human thought has a psychological, rather than linguistic, basis. This claim is argued for by way of a survey of the linguistic diversity of the forms of genericity, and the presentation of a psychological model from recent experimental work done by Prasada and Dillingham that promises to confer unity on the genericity phenomena while explaining how the linguistic diversity relates to a single cognitive representation of a form of generality.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 369-394 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Ratio |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 9 Oct 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
Profiles
-
John Collins
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Professor of Philosophy
- Philosophy - Member
Person: Academic, Teaching & Research