Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genomic evidence supports the “long chronology” for the peopling of Sahul

  • Francesca Gandini
  • , Mafalda Almeida
  • , M. George B. Foody
  • , Nano Nagle
  • , Anders Bergström
  • , Anna Olivieri
  • , Simão Rodrigues
  • , Alessandro Fichera
  • , Gonzalo Oteo-Garcia
  • , Antonio Torroni
  • , Alessandro Achilli
  • , William Pomat
  • , Zafarina Zainuddin
  • , Ken Khong Eng
  • , Tarek Shoeib
  • , Teresa Rito
  • , David Bulbeck
  • , Sue O’Connor
  • , Jarosław Bryk
  • , Maria Pala
  • Michael j. Grant, Ceiridwen J. Edwards, Stephen J. Oppenheimer, Robert J. Mitchell, Pedro A. Soares, Helen Farr, Martin B. Richards

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The timing of the settlement of Sahul—the Pleistocene landmass formed by present-day New Guinea, Australia, and Tasmania that existed until ~9000 years ago (~9 ka)—remains highly contentious. The so-called “long chronology” posits the first main arrivals at ~60 to 65 ka, whereas a “short chronology” proposes 47 to 51 ka. Here, we exhaustively analyze an unprecedentedly large mitogenome dataset (n = 2456) encompassing the full range of diversity from the indigenous populations of Australia, New Guinea, and Oceania, including a lineage related to those of New Guinea in an archaeological sample from Wallacea. We assess these lineages in the context of variation from Southeast Asia and a reevaluation of the mitogenome mutation rate, alongside genome-wide and Y-chromosome variation, and archaeological and climatological evidence. In contrast to recent recombinational dating approaches, we find support for the long chronology, suggesting settlement by ~60 ka via at least two distinct routes into Sahul.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScience Advances
Volume11
Issue number48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2025

Cite this